Hamburg, Germany | info@dgfvetsolutions.com | LinkedIn | EN / ES / DE
EU Veterinary Pharmacovigilance

Outsourced QPPV and PV compliance for veterinary MAHs

We help Marketing Authorisation Holders meet their pharmacovigilance obligations under EU Regulation 2019/6, so they can focus on their products.

Regulation (EU) 2019/6 compliant
EVVet submission ready
Service in English, Spanish & German

End-to-end pharmacovigilance for your veterinary products

From individual case processing to the annual benefit-risk review. We cover the full scope.

QPPV services

Named or deputy Qualified Person Responsible for Pharmacovigilance for your EU veterinary marketing authorisations. Resident in the EU, available to competent authorities.

Adverse event case processing

We handle intake, validation, VeDDRA coding, ABON causality assessment, follow-up, and EVVet submission within the 30-day regulatory timeline.

Signal management

Continuous monitoring of your pharmacovigilance data, signal detection and evaluation, and preparation of the annual benefit-risk review report for IRIS submission.

Literature monitoring

We screen PubMed, CAB Abstracts, and key veterinary journals by active substance and target species. Biweekly or monthly, with full documentation.

What working with DGF looks like

Real examples of how we handle pharmacovigilance obligations on behalf of our clients.

Incoming report

A veterinarian in the Netherlands reports unexpected sedation lasting 18 hours in two dogs following administration of a licensed anti-parasitic product. One animal required veterinary observation overnight. No fatalities.

SERIOUS · UNEXPECTED
Day 0: Intake

Case received and assessed for seriousness

Report arrives via email from the reporting veterinarian. We assess seriousness criteria under Reg. 2019/6 Art. 76: the extended sedation in two animals qualifies as a serious adverse event. Case is entered into the PV database and a unique case ID is assigned.

Seriousness: Serious Expectedness: Unexpected Species: Canine
Day 1–3: Coding & Assessment

VeDDRA coding and causality assessment completed

Clinical signs are coded using VeDDRA terminology. ABON causality assessment is performed: the temporal relationship between administration and onset, the absence of alternative explanations, and the known pharmacological profile of the active substance are evaluated. Causality: Possible.

VeDDRA: 10039908 — Somnolence ABON: Possible (B)
Day 5: Follow-up

Follow-up request sent to reporting veterinarian

Additional information requested: concomitant medications, breed and body weight of both animals, outcome at 48 h. Follow-up received on Day 8. Both animals recovered fully. Case updated in the database.

Day 12: Submission

EVVet report submitted to EudraVigilance Vet

Final case narrative compiled, quality-reviewed, and submitted electronically via EVVet to the European Medicines Agency. Submission receipt archived. Client notified with case summary. Regulatory deadline: 30 days for serious cases.

Day 12 of 30
✓ On time
Ongoing: Signal tracking

Case flagged for signal review

Because the event was unexpected, the case is tagged in our signal management system. At the next quarterly signal review, we will assess whether a pattern is emerging across the product's full adverse event history and whether SPC update or IRIS notification is warranted.

Flagged for signal review Q3 2026

1. Data aggregation

All individual case safety reports (ICSRs) received in the period are retrieved from the PV database and stratified by active substance, target species, and event term.

Input 12 ICSRs received Q1 2026 · 3 products · 4 target species

2. Signal detection

We apply proportional analysis and clinical review to identify disproportionate reporting of specific VeDDRA terms. Literature hits from the monitoring period are cross-referenced.

Finding 2 cases of injection-site reaction in cattle (expected, no new signal) · 1 potential signal: vomiting in cats ≥ 10 kg (3 cases, unexpected cluster)

3. Signal evaluation

The potential vomiting signal is evaluated against cumulative case data, the product's approved SPC, and published pharmacokinetic data. A causality assessment is applied at the aggregate level.

Assessment Plausible biological mechanism identified. Signal strength: moderate. Recommended action: monitor for 2 further quarters before SPC update consideration.

4. Annual benefit-risk review

Findings are consolidated into the annual benefit-risk review report, covering all products in the portfolio. The report is submitted to the competent authority via IRIS by the regulatory deadline.

Deliverable Annual benefit-risk report · IRIS submission · PSMF update · Client summary memo

Every engagement with DGF produces documented, audit-ready outputs. Here is what a client with a full PV support retainer receives:

Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs)

Fully coded, causality-assessed, and EVVet-submitted reports for every adverse event received. Each case archived with full audit trail and submission receipt.

Quarterly signal review memo

Summary of all ICSRs received in the period, signal detection findings, and recommended actions. Written in plain language for non-PV management teams.

Literature monitoring report

Biweekly or monthly screening results from PubMed, CAB Abstracts, and target journals. Relevant publications flagged, assessed for reportability, and archived.

Annual benefit-risk review report

Full narrative report covering the product's benefit-risk balance for the reference period, submitted to the competent authority via IRIS by the regulatory deadline.

PSMF maintenance

Pharmacovigilance System Master File kept current: annex updates, deviation log, QPPV contact list, and system description. Ready for inspection at any time.

Named QPPV coverage

An EU-resident, competent-authority-accessible Qualified Person Responsible for Pharmacovigilance listed on your product authorisations throughout the engagement.

Built for MAHs who need PV done right

Four things that actually matter when you are choosing a PV partner.

1

Veterinary-only focus

We only work in veterinary pharmacovigilance. Our SOPs, templates, and expertise are built around Regulation (EU) 2019/6 and what it actually requires of veterinary MAHs. No human pharma crossover.

2

Trilingual service

We work in English, Spanish, and German. If you are dealing with EMA, BVL, or AEMPS, you do not need a translator in the room.

3

Regulatory + clinical background

I trained as a veterinarian, then moved into regulatory affairs at a national competent authority, then into industry. I know how both sides read a dossier, and I know what inspectors look for.

4

Flexible engagement model

Retainer, per case, or project based. One product or twenty. We work with whatever your situation actually is, not a fixed package.

Not sure if your PV system meets Regulation (EU) 2019/6 requirements?

Request a free PV gap assessment

Common questions from MAHs

Do I need a QPPV if I only have one or two products?
+
Yes. Regulation (EU) 2019/6 requires every Marketing Authorisation Holder to designate a Qualified Person Responsible for Pharmacovigilance, regardless of portfolio size. The QPPV must be resident in the EU and accessible to competent authorities at all times. There is no minimum product threshold.
What is the difference between a named QPPV and a deputy QPPV?
+
The named QPPV is the primary point of responsibility listed in your PSMF and notified to the competent authority. A deputy QPPV provides cover during absences. DGF can serve as either. We can act as your named QPPV, as a deputy to an in-house QPPV, or provide both.
How are adverse events reported to you by veterinarians or product users?
+
We set up a dedicated pharmacovigilance contact channel for your organisation, typically an email address listed on your product packaging and SmPC. Reports received through that channel, through your sales team, or through national pharmacovigilance systems are all captured and processed within the required timelines.
What is a PSMF and do I need to maintain one?
+
The Pharmacovigilance System Master File describes your PV system in full: the QPPV, the IT systems, the SOPs, staff lists, and audit history. It must be kept current and produced to competent authorities on request, including during inspections. DGF maintains your PSMF as part of retainer engagements.
How much does outsourced PV support cost?
+
It depends on portfolio size, expected case volume, and what services you need. We offer retainer pricing for predictable monthly costs, per-case pricing for low-volume portfolios, and project pricing for defined tasks like PSMF set-up or gap assessments. A free 30-minute PV gap assessment is the best starting point. It gives you a clear picture of your obligations and we can build a proposal from there.
Can DGF take over an existing PV system from another CRO?
+
Yes. Transitions between PV service providers are straightforward when managed carefully. We conduct a handover review to assess the current state of your PSMF, case database, and outstanding submissions. A transition plan is agreed with you and the outgoing provider before any formal change of QPPV is notified to the competent authority.

From the DGF team

Practical notes on veterinary pharmacovigilance, EU regulation, and animal health compliance.

Pharmacovigilance

What veterinary pharmacovigilance actually covers under Regulation (EU) 2019/6

Most small MAHs think pharmacovigilance starts and ends with adverse event reporting. Under EU Regulation 2019/6, it covers five distinct obligations, each with its own deadlines.

Pharmacovigilance

The base of pharmacovigilance in veterinary medicines

Safety monitoring of a veterinary medicine is a chain of linked steps: detect, report, assess, submit, act. Miss one link and the whole chain breaks.

Pharmacovigilance

The most common adverse event reporting mistakes

Three reporting errors that turn a routine case into a regulatory finding: late initial reports, missing causality assessments, and inconsistent case narratives.

Your partner in EU veterinary compliance

David Gomez, DVM, MSc

I trained as a veterinarian and moved into regulatory affairs. I have worked on the evaluation side at a national competent authority and on the industry side for animal health and crop protection products. I know how the EU market access process works from both ends.

I set up DGF because there is a real gap in the EU veterinary market. Most MAHs need solid pharmacovigilance but do not have the volume or the budget for a large CRO. That is the space we work in.

Based in Hamburg, Germany.

DVM — Universidad de La Salle MSc Agricultural Sciences — University of Bonn (DAAD) LS Academy Veterinary PV Certificate EU Regulation 2019/6 EVVet / IRIS

Let's talk about your PV needs

Tell us about your situation and we will respond within one business day. No obligation, no sales pitch.